Help Your Clients, Not Their Anxiety

In family law, the path to reunification hinges on trust, dignity, and cooperation—not surveillance. This timely article sheds light on why GPS tracking—though technically feasible—undermines those ideals when layered atop alcohol monitoring in custody cases. Drawing on insights from respected family law practitioners, it illustrates how adding location tracking shifts the narrative from support to suspicion, eroding the rapport courts and families strive to build.

A Call for Respectful Accountability

By choosing to center privacy over punitive practices, attorneys and judges can foster environments where parents comply willingly, children feel secure, and courts restore—not fracture—family bonds. This piece lays out a clear roadmap for keeping monitoring focused on sobriety while preserving the human dignity that lies at the heart of meaningful family law work.

What You’ll Discover (Download the Resource to Learn More)

Expert Perspectives

• Why GPS tracking in family law cases can unwittingly fuel adversarial dynamics rather than promote rehabilitation—even when intended to enhance oversight.

• How remote breathalyzer systems like Soberlink, when kept discreet and narrow in scope, encourage compliance by reinforcing dignity—not imposing control.

Unpacking the Stakes

• The psychological and relational consequences of expanding monitoring beyond sobriety to include location—why it can backfire in trust-building and prolong conflict.

Privacy as a Legal & Therapeutic Priority

• Why courts and practitioners must weigh inherent privacy rights alongside child safety—and how thoughtful implementation strengthens both.

Technical Design Meets Ethical Responsibility

• How Soberlink’s portable, covert, and focused monitoring tools protect client autonomy and support recovery—contrasting with intrusive alternatives.

Download this article now to transform how you approach alcohol monitoring in custody cases—from a tool of oversight to a step toward healing.